<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mathematics &#8211; All My Base</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.allmybase.com/category/mathematics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.allmybase.com</link>
	<description>...are belong to the internet.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 14:25:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Tetration and the what-now with the who-when?</title>
		<link>https://blog.allmybase.com/2009/04/23/tetration-and-the-what-now-with-the-who-when/</link>
					<comments>https://blog.allmybase.com/2009/04/23/tetration-and-the-what-now-with-the-who-when/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brose]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 03:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mathematics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allmybase.com/?p=10</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s an interesting concept, and one that&#8217;s, rather surprisingly, widely unknown. It&#8217;s called tetration, a concept brought up so rarely that most computer dictionaries don&#8217;t even recognize it as being a word. I was organizing my filesystem hierarchy today, and found this old paper I wrote for my Discrete Mathematics class. I gave it a [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an interesting concept, and one that&#8217;s, rather surprisingly, widely unknown. It&#8217;s called tetration, a concept brought up so rarely that most computer dictionaries don&#8217;t even recognize it as being a word. I was organizing my filesystem hierarchy today, and found this old paper I wrote for my Discrete Mathematics class. I gave it a quick re-read, and the concepts still amaze me. It is truly impossible to ignore the beauty of mathematics, especially after seeing something like this.</p>
<div id="attachment_11" style="width: 310px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-11" class="size-medium wp-image-11" title="2008analuxpfig1d" src="https://allmybase.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/2008analuxpfig1d-300x138.jpg" alt="Drawing of the analytic extension f = F(x + iy) of tetration to the complex plane." width="300" height="138" srcset="https://blog.allmybase.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/2008analuxpfig1d-300x138.jpg 300w, https://blog.allmybase.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/2008analuxpfig1d.jpg 681w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /><p id="caption-attachment-11" class="wp-caption-text">Drawing of the analytic extension f = F(x + iy) of tetration to the complex plane.</p></div>
<p>The basic premise of tetration is simply a continuation of what has already been examined since, well, probably kindergarten. Everyone knows what addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division are. But consider this concept for a moment: multiplication is just repeated addition, exponentiation (x^y) is just repeated multiplication, and tetration, well, that&#8217;s just repeated exponentiation! It has other names as well. Since it&#8217;s concept looks something like a^b^b^b^b, it has been called a power-tower. It is also interesting to note that we&#8217;ve all seen an equation somewhere or another that may have looked something like: a^b^2. Now, the simplest way to solve this would be to start by squaring b, then raising a to that power. But if b were to resolve to a value of two &#8211; well, that&#8217;s tetration! It&#8217;s pretty neat to see how tetration can be often be used, yet is relatively unknown.</p>
<p>And here&#8217;s where it starts to get even stickier &#8211; it doesn&#8217;t stop at tetration! If there&#8217;s an operation n, that means that there is an operation n+1 which formulates itself as the repeated nth operation. So that means there&#8217;s an infinite number of operations that can be performed on numbers. It&#8217;s also crazy to think that there&#8217;s an operation at infinity, so that given any non-zero inputs, an infinite value would be returned. There&#8217;s a lot of power to be found in tetration and nth-term iterative operators, and oddly enough, if I had to guess that the problem had a solution, I would say this would be a good starting point for which to solve the [<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemann_hypothesis">Riemann hypothesis</a>].This is some crazy stuff here, and if it&#8217;ll help anyone to further understand, I&#8217;ve uploaded my findings on tetration to this server for download [<a href="/dropbox/tetration.pdf">here</a>]. Enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blog.allmybase.com/2009/04/23/tetration-and-the-what-now-with-the-who-when/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
